5.0 Collector Roads and Streets

Basic Geometric Standards
Level of Service
Design Speed
Sight Distance
.....Stopping Sight Distance
.....Corner Sight Distance
Lane and Shoulder Widths for Urban Collectors
Lane and Shoulder Widths on Rural Collectors
Bridge Widths and Structural Capacities
Vertical Clearance
Horizontal Clearance
Alignment
Grades
Cross-slope
Superelevation
Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations
........Shared Use of the Highway by Bicycles
........Bicycles on Bridges
........Designated Bicycle Routes and Lanes
........Pedestrian Facilities
Special Design Guidelines
.........Common Tools
.........Historic/Archaeological Considerations
........ Natural Resources
.........Recreational Resources
.........Scenic Roads or Views Considerations
.........Village or City Entrance Considerations
.........Economic Vitality Considerations

5.1 Basic Geometric Standards   (Back to top of page)

Design criteria for rural, urban and village Collectors are summarized below. Other AASHTO design criteria, as presented in the 1990 "Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" are also applicable where they do not conflict with these Standards.

5.2 Level of Service  (Back to top of page)

Rural Collector roads should be designed for a level of service C or better. However, level of service D is acceptable, where unusually high traffic volumes exist or where terrain is rolling or mountainous.

Collectors in urban or village areas will generally be designed for a level of service D or better. However, in heavily developed village or urban areas, level of service E may be appropriate as judged on a case by case basis. Reference is made in this regard to the VAOT July 25, 1996 Highway Design Level of Service Policy.

5.3 Design Speed  (Back to top of page)

Rural Collectors are normally designed for speeds of 25 to 50 mph depending on terrain, driver expectancy and other characteristics.

Collectors in urban or village areas are normally designed for speeds of 25 to 50 mph

For rural, village, and urban Collectors, the design speed will normally be equal to the anticipated posted speed. However, lower design and posted speeds may be considered in certain circumstances:

> To avoid and/or minimize impacts to historical, architectural, scenic, natural or other resources.

> To avoid excessive costs of construction.

> To better comply with a town or regional plan.

Design speeds may be lower than legal speeds. Design speeds as much as 10 miles per hour lower than legal speeds may be used without the requirement of a formal design exception, provided appropriate warnings are posted.

5.4 Sight Distance  (Back to top of page)

5.4.1 Stopping Sight Distance   (Back to top of page)

Minimum stopping sight distances on rural and urban Collectors will adhere to the values in Table 5.1

 

Table 5.1

Minimum Stopping Sight Distance For Collectors (Wet Pavements)

   

Rehabilitation, Reconstruction or New Construction

Design Speed (mph)

Stopping Sight Distance (ft)

K Value for Crest Vertical Curve

K Value for Sag Vertical Curve

25

150

20

30

30

200

30

40

35

225

40

50

40

275

60

60

45

325

80

70

50

400

110

90

5.4.2 Corner Sight Distance  (Back to top of page)

Corner sight distances for rural and urban collectors will meet the minimum requirements of Table 5.2.

 

Table 5.2

Minimum Corner Sight Distances(a)

For Collectors

Design Speed on Main Road (mph)

Corner Sight Distance (ft)

25

275

30

330

35

385

40

440

45

495

50

550

55

605

(a) Corner sight distance is measured from a point on the intersecting road or driveway, at least 15 feet from the edge of traveled way on the main road.

 

5.5 Lane and Shoulder Widths for Urban Collectors   (Back to top of page)

On urban and village Collectors, lane widths may vary from 9 to 11 feet, and there should be appropriate offsets to curb. The 9-foot widths are appropriate in highly restricted areas having little or no truck traffic. The 11-foot lane widths are generally used on all higher speed, free-flowing Collectors.

Lane and shoulder widths within Historic Districts should be compatible with the historic character of the District.

Shoulders are desirable on urban and village Collectors, and should be provided where feasible to facilitate maneuvering space for immobilized vehicles, safety for the pedestrian in areas where sidewalks are not provided, safe accommodation of bicycles, speed-change lanes for vehicles turning into driveways, and storage space for plowed snow. Despite these advantages, the width of shoulders in urban and village areas may be restricted because of available right-of-way, adjacent development and other constraints.

Where needed in residential areas, a parallel parking lane of 7 feet may be used. In commercial and industrial areas the desirable parking lane width is 8 feet. Curb offsets are not included in the minimum width of parking lanes noted here. 9 to 11 foot parking lanes should be used when the use of the parking lane during peak periods for through traffic is necessary.

As an absolute minimum, a 2-foot offset to vertical curb should be provided, and a 1-foot offset to sloped curb. In all cases, drainage grates and drop inlets should be designed so that they do not project into a travel lane. Drainage grates should always be bicycle-safe in design.

5.6 Lane and Shoulder Widths on Rural Collectors  (Back to top of page)

Lane and shoulder widths on rural Collectors will adhere to values in Table 5.3. Note that the shoulder widths in this table are considered necessary for adequate safety and service for this class of highway, and may exceed the minimum paved widths needed solely to provide bicycle safety. The required shoulder width beyond that needed to adequately accommodate bicycles as defined in Section 5.14 need not be paved.

 

 

Table 5.3

Minimum Width of Lanes and Shoulders

for Two Lane Rural Collectors

Projected Design

Traffic Volume

ADT

0-400

ADT

400-1500

ADT

1500-2000

ADT

Over 2000

Design Speed (mph)    

Width of Lane/Shoulder (ft)

25

9/2

9/2

10/3

11/3

30

9/2

9/2

10/3

11/3

35

9/2

9/2

10/3

11/3

40

9/2

9/2

10/3

11/3

45

9/2

9/2

10/3

11/3

50

9/2

10/2

10/3

11/3

 

 

5.7 Bridge Widths and Structural Capacities   (Back to top of page)

State policy favors the rehabilitation of existing bridges. In choosing between the rehabilitation of an existing bridge and the construction of a new bridge, whether on the existing location or on a new location, the agency shall weigh the following factors:

1. the functional classification of the highway;

2. the load capacity and geometric constraints of the bridge and the availability of alternative routes;

3. the comparative long-term costs, risks, and benefits of rehabilitation and new construction;

4. the requirements of state standards for geometric design;

5. disruption to homes and businesses;

6. environmental impacts;

7. the potential effects of the local and state economies;

8. cost-effectiveness;

9. mobility, including bicycles and pedestrians;

10. safety, as determined by factors such as accident history for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists;

11. local or regional plans as interpreted by the adopting entity, and state agency plans;

12. the impact on the historic, scenic, and aesthetic values of the municipality, as interpreted by the municipality, in which the highway is located; and

13. if it is a forest highway under federal jurisdiction.

State policy for the reconstruction of bridges on Collectors favors preservation within existing footprints, in order to ensure compatibility with the Vermont setting and to reduce costs and environmental impacts. Where reconstruction within the existing footprint is not feasible, the full width of approach roadways as shown in Table 5.3 should be provided across all new bridges on rural Collectors, and the same curb-to-curb width as the street across all new and replacement bridges on urban and village Collectors. New bridges should be designed to HS-25 loading capacity.

With regard to a bridge located on a municipal highway, a municipality may request the agency to adhere to one or more of the following guidelines:

1. where feasible, the rehabilitated or replacement bridge shall occupy the same curb-to-curb width or alignment, or both, as the existing bridge or the existing approaches to the existing bridge, or both;

2. unless otherwise required by law, a bridge that does not already carry a sidewalk may be rehabilitated without adding a sidewalk and a replacement bridge may be built without a sidewalk or with a sidewalk on only one side; or

3. in rehabilitating a historically significant bridge, the design of the rehabilitated bridge must retain the bridge's historic character, to the extent feasible.

Historic bridges may be rehabilitated for continued use on collectors if they can be rehabilitated to have a roadway clear width of at least 20 feet and an HS-15 capacity. Other historic bridges may be considered for design exceptions so that they may remain in place on collectors and be considered for future rehabilitation rather than replacement.

Bridges may also be considered for continued use providing they meet the requirements of Table 5.4.

If a historic bridge can be rehabilitated or a replacement bridge is in the same location and has the same profile, a design speed need not be selected.

 

Table 5.4

Bridges to Remain in Place on Collector Roads and Streets

Current Traffic ADT

Design Loading

Structural Capacity

Roadway Clear

Width (ft)(a)

0-1500

HS-15

20

1500-2000

HS-15

22

Over 2000

HS-15

26

(a) Clear width between curbs or rails, whichever is the lesser, is considered to be at least the same as the roadway

approach traveled way width.

5.8 Vertical Clearance  (Back to top of page)

New or reconstructed structures should provide at least 14 feet of vertical clearance over the entire roadway width, including shoulders plus an additional clearance of 3 inches for future resurfacing of the under passing roadway.

Structures over railroads should provide a minimum vertical clearance of 23 feet over both rails, unless otherwise provided in a variance agreement entered into by the Agency of Transportation, the railroad and any affected municipality, and approved by the Transportation Board in accordance with 5 VSA, Section 3670. Where "double-stacks" are to be accommodated on the railroad, an absolute minimum vertical clearance of 20.75 feet will be required.

On state highways and their connecting links on Class I town highways, bridges over rivers and other bodies of water should be designed to pass a 50-year frequency flood with a minimum clearance of 1 foot between the water surface elevation and the low chord of the bridge. In addition overtopping of the roadway must not be permitted during the 50-year flood. Consideration shall also be given to the potential effects of the 100-year flood on upstream property, the environment, hazards to human life and floodplain management criteria.

Other town highway bridges over rivers and other bodies of water will, where practicable, be designed to pass the 25-year frequency flood with a minimum clearance of 1 foot between the water surface elevation and the low chord of the bridge. In addition, overtopping of the road should not be permitted during the 25-year flood. Consideration shall also be given to the potential effects of the 100-year flood on upstream and downstream property, the environment, hazards to human life and floodplain management criteria.

5.9 Horizontal Clearance  (Back to top of page)

A clear unobstructed roadside is highly desirable for motorist safety along rural collectors. Clear zone distances for new construction and reconstruction projects on rural principal arterials will normally be based on the values shown in Table 5.5.

 

Table 5.5

Minimum Clear Zone Distances (in feet from edge of traveled lane)

For Rural Collectors

Design Speed (mph)

Design ADT (VPD)

Fill Slopes

Cut Slopes

1:4 or flatter

1:3

1:3

1:4 or flatter

45 or less

 

Under 750

7

*

7

7

750-1500

12

*

10

10

1500-6000

14

*

12

12

Over 6000

16

*

14

14

50

Under 750

12

*

8

8

750-1500

16

*

10

12

1500-6000

20

*

12

14

Over 6000

24

*

14

18

* Since recovery is less likely on the unshielded, traversable 1:3 slopes, fixed objects should not be present in the vicinity of the toe of these slopes. Recovery of high speed vehicles that encroach beyond the edge of the shoulder may be expected to occur beyond the toe of the slope. Determination of the width of the recovery area at the toe of the slope should take into consideration right-of-way availability, environmental concerns, economic factors, safety needs, and accident histories.

Notes:

1. Selection of a clear zone may or may not provide adequate sight distance. In those cases where inadequate sight distance results, the designer should specify the need for a sight easement, or otherwise adjust the design to provide needed sight lines.

2. In cut areas without guard rail, it is recommended that the clear zone extend to the back of ditch. This may be wider than the typical clear zone width for the project. The placement of poles or other non-crashworthy features in the ditch is not desirable, as errant vehicles are likely to travel to the bottom of the ditch.

3. The designer may choose to increase the clear zone width on the outside of horizontal curves where accident histories indicate a need, or where specific site investigation shows a definitive accident potential. This may be cost effective where increased banking or other accident countermeasures are not feasible.

Despite the recommendations of Table 5.5, clear zones as narrow as 10 feet may be used on rural principal arterials, without design exception, where necessary to avoid or minimize disturbance of significant historic, archaeological, scenic, natural or other resources. In addition, on low speed (45 mph or less) rural collectors, clear zones may be limited to 10 feet, irrespective of the recommendations of Table 5.5.

On uncurbed urban and village collectors, clear zones will be the same as for rural areas.

On curbed collector urban and village streets, a 1.5 foot horizontal offset to obstructions from face of curb should be provided. This dimension should be increased to 3 feet near turning radii at intersections with side roads and driveways.

5.10 Alignment  (Back to top of page)

Horizontal curvature will normally be designed in accordance with recommended AASHTO values for the design speed. However, curves up to 15 mph below the stated design speed may be used, without design exception, where necessary to avoid and/or minimize disturbance of historic, archaeological, scenic, natural or other resources. In addition, horizontal curves within 750 feet of a stop sign may be designed up to 15 mph below the stated design speed without design exception. When curvature sharper than the AASHTO recommended value is used, a post-construction test of those curves will be conducted, and advisory speeds will be posted where appropriate.

5.11 Grades  (Back to top of page)

Maximum grades on rural and urban Collectors will adhere to the values shown in Tables 5.6 and 5.7. In curbed areas of village and urban streets and on all bridges, grades less than 1 percent should be avoided where possible to promote efficient runoff of storm water.

 

Table 5.6

Maximum Grades for Rural Collectors

Type of Terrain

Design Speed (mph)

25

30-35

40-45

50

Maximum Grade (percent)

Level

7

7

7

6

Rolling

10

9

8

7

Mountainous

11

10

10

9

 

 

Table 5.7

Maximum Grades for Urban and Village Collectors

Type of Terrain

Design Speed (mph)

25 30-35 40 45 50

Maximum Grade (percent)

Level

9

9

9

8

7

Rolling

12

11

10

9

8

Mountainous

13

12

12

11

10

5.12 Cross-slope  (Back to top of page)

Two-lane pavements are normally designed with a centerline crown and a parabolic surface with an average cross slope of 2 percent. When drainage is carried across adjacent lanes, the cross slope may be increased from one lane to another. Refer to the VAOT design manual for cross-slope design in various situations.

5.13 Superelevation  (Back to top of page)

When the use of curves is required on a rural Collector alignment, a superelevation rate compatible with the design speed must be used. Superelevation of curves on rural Collectors should not exceed 8 percent. Where a side road intersects on the outside of a main road curve, superelevation of the main road curve should be limited to 6 percent or less to prevent operational difficulties for vehicles entering the main road under snowy or icy conditions.

Superelevation is generally not used on low-speed (45 mph or less) curbed urban and village streets. This is to avoid problems with such items as drainage, ice formation, driveways, pedestrian crossings and developed property. Refer to the 1990 AASHTO Policy, Chapter III, for a detailed discussion of design for low-speed urban streets.

5.14 Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations  (Back to top of page)

Bicycles and pedestrian traffic may be expected along the sides of most Collector roads and streets. Where bicycles and pedestrians are allowed by law, the roadway should be designed and constructed under the assumption that it will be used by bicyclists and pedestrians. Bicycles require a paved surface; pedestrians, however, may often be adequately accommodated on unpaved roadway shoulders.

In recent decades, highways were not always designed with bicycle and pedestrian travel in mind. There are many ways in which roadway corridors should be improved to more safely accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Bicycle accommodation within the highway corridor may take four forms: (1) shared use of the highway by bicycles and motor vehicles, (2) designated bicycle route, (3) designated bicycle lane, or (4) a separated bicycle path. Many of the tools listed in section 5.15.1 provide roadways which are safer for bicyclists and pedestrians.

5.14.1 Shared Use of the Highway by Bicycles  (Back to top of page)

Adequate accommodation of bicycles in rural areas is usually provided by paved shoulders designed to the widths shown in Section 5.6 above. However, where shoulders width is less than those values, and where shoulder paving must be minimized and in urban or village areas, Tables 5.8, 5.9 and 5.10 provide additional guidance in the selection of appropriate widths of paved areas to safely accommodate bicycles and motor vehicles on the same facility. Note that additional width may be desirable in very high traffic areas or where sight distance is restricted.

 

Table 5.8

Minimum Width of Paved Shoulder to Accommodate Shared Use of Rural Collector Roadways by Bicycles

Projected Design Traffic Volume

ADT

0-1500

ADT

1500-2000

ADT

Over 2000

Design Speed (mph)

Width of Paved Shoulder (ft)(a)

25-30

2

2

2

35-40

2

2

3

45

2

3

3

50

2

3

3

(a) Add 1 foot on bridges or where % trucks >10%.

 

Table 5.9

Minimum Width of Paved Shoulders to

Accommodate Shared Use of Urban or

Village Collector Streets With Curbing by Bicycles

Projected Design Traffic Volumes

ADT

0-1500

ADT

1500-2000

ADT

>2000

Design Speed (mph)

Width of Paved Shoulder (ft)(a)(b)(c)

25

2

2

2

30

2

2

3

35

2

3

3

40

2

3

4

45

3

4

4

50

4

4

4

(a) Width may be reduced by 1 foot in uncurbed areas.

(b) These recommendations are for areas where there is no adjacent on-street parking. Where parking exists, special consideration must be given to achieve safe accommodation for bicyclists.

(c) For cases where shoulder width adjacent to curb is less than 5 feet, recessed drainage inlets or curb inlets should be used.

In lieu of a paved shoulder, it is permissible to use a shared-use curb lane of a least the width shown in Table 5.10. When a shared-use lane is employed, a white edge line should be placed within 1 foot of the face of curb to discourage parking. For all shared-use curb lanes, recessed drainage inlets or curb inlets should be used.

 

Table 5.10

Minimum Width of a Shared Use Curb Lane

to Accommodate Shared Use of Urban or

Village Collector Streets by Bicycles

Projected Design Traffic Volume

ADT

0-1500

ADT

1500-2000

ADT

>2000

Design Speed (mph)

Width of Shared-Use Curb Lane (ft)

25-30

12

12

13

35

12

13

13

40

13

13

14

45

13

14

14

50

14

14

14

5.14.2 Bicycles on Bridges  (Back to top of page)

Wherever bicycles are to be accommodated on newly constructed bridges, shoulders with a minimum dimension as shown in Tables 5.8, 5.9 and 5.10 should be provided between the parapet, rail or barrier and the edge of the nearest travel lane.

5.14.3 Designated Bicycle Routes and Lanes  (Back to top of page)

Designated bicycle routes or lanes may be appropriate along some Collector roads and streets. Because designated routes and lanes will attract bicyclists encompassing a wide range of abilities, special care must be taken to ensure adequate widths. Principal concerns for designated bicycle routes and lanes are rider safety and comfort. Because of these concerns, some high speed and/or high volume collector routes may not be appropriate for designated routes and lanes. In such cases, alternate routes or separate paths for bicycles may be desirable.

5.14.4 Pedestrian Facilities  (Back to top of page)

Adequate accommodation of pedestrians must be designed for all roadway projects. Depending on the locality and expected frequency of pedestrians, adequate accommodation may range from a graded space alongside a rural road to a sidewalk in a village or city. Projects in urban or village areas shall include consideration of sidewalks and crossing locations. In addition, at the request of a municipality, sidewalks should be considered in other areas of expected pedestrian use such as near schools and recreation areas.

Where pedestrians are accommodated on sidewalks, the design must observe, to the extent possible, current Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). These guidelines establish acceptable grades, cross-slopes, widths, ramps, surface textures and other facets of pedestrian facility design.

Pedestrian accommodation on combined bicycle/pedestrian paths must also respect the ADAAG to the extent feasible.

Pedestrian accommodation along the shoulders of roadways do not need to comply with ADAAG. However, to the extent that those guidelines can reasonably be achieved, the designer is urged to do so.

5.15 Special Design Guidelines   (Back to top of page)

These Special Design Guidelines are presented to assist the designer in avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating negative impacts upon the environment and other sensitive resources as well as to enhance the design to fit the context of the project site. These Special Design Guidelines note the importance of the individual resources and suggest tools which may be used in the development of a design which recognizes the resource at the proper level of importance. Under this Functional Classification there are guidelines for:

> Historic/Archaeological Resources

> Natural Resources

> Recreational Resources

> Scenic Resources

> Village or City Entrance Considerations

> Economic Vitality Considerations

When such resources are present within a project site and the use of the tools suggested do not provide an adequate protection of the resources then the design may be eligible for reductions in geometric values. The decision to pursue reductions in the standards is subject to approval in accordance with the "VAOT Design Exception Policy".

The primary strategy for Collector road and street projects on new alignment should be to avoid or minimize the impact on the resource. When the project must remain on existing alignment such as a major roadway reconstruction, "Preservation" or "3R" project, bridge repair or replacement, design solutions should be pursued that minimize the extent of the impact. Collector roads and streets should be designed to allow both local access and mobility and as such should make the most use of tools to avoid impact to sensitive resources. Reduction in the size/area of impact, and the utilization of creative design and engineering solutions should be pursued. The following strategies are described as "common tools" in the following subsection to avoid impact to the resources.

5.15.1 Common Tools  (Back to top of page)

> Alignment modification including: adjustment of horizontal and vertical curves to avoid sensitive areas and to fit with topographical features

> Reduction in Posted Speed

> Reduction/minimization of lane and shoulder widths

> Reduction/minimization clear zones

> Sharpening of horizontal curves with advisory speed postings

> Alterations to typical cross sections including:

$ Roadside ditches shallower than normal

$ Sideslopes steeper than normal (in combination with additional guardrail)

$ Use of curb and closed drainage systems, elimination of roadside ditching

$ Retaining walls

> Other traffic calming techniques, such as intersection diverters, roundabouts, channelization, speed humps, speed tables, angle points, and gateways.

> Wetland and wetland buffer restoration/creation

> Wildlife habitat restoration/creation

> Water quality/stream bank, stream buffer, lake buffer creation, restoration, and enhancement

> On and Off - site mitigation

> View/scenic enhancement through vegetation management and grading of sideslopes

> Selection of appropriate guard rail or other roadside barriers to accomplish visibility through to views or to blend in with foreground views

> Use of guard rail to allow steeper than 1:4 graded slopes, retaining walls or cribbing

> Use of guard rail to allow preservation of significant features including native and planted vegetation

> Use of grade separation/bridging/elevated structures etc.

> Separation of vehicular/pedestrian facilities

> Fencing or landscaping for screening or earth berm buffers

> Retrofitting of historical bridges for alternative uses off-site

> Integration of historical features in interpretive facilities, overlooks, etc.

> Light poles and fixtures with down shielded luminaires.

> Architectural/Landscape design:

$ street trees

$ use of native materials

$ use of architectural design details

$ pedestrian facilities

$ signage

$ historical design elements

5.15.2 Historic/Archaeological Considerations  (Back to top of page)

Collector road and street projects should be designed to avoid historic or archaeological resources wherever possible. This may be in the form of avoiding disturbance of specific sites and structures as well as historic districts or areas where the presence of the road is disturbing to the historic land use and development pattern. Designers must contend with environmental constraints to fit new and renovated roadways within historic environments.

Where Collector roads and streets pass through historic town centers, an appropriate response is to work with local officials to reconcile posted speed and historic property conflicts and to apply that resolution to the specific community context. Reduction in lane and shoulder widths may be considered as appropriate to avoid the imposition of wider road sections through historically sensitive areas. Additionally, decisions regarding measures to accomplish speed management should be considered.

Providing curbs along Collector roads and streets in historic areas will allow both improved pedestrian safety as well as reduce in clear zone requirements. Street trees and other urban streetscape elements are essential parts of these roads. Every effort should be made to design enhancements which maximum integration of the Collector road and streets with the historic area.

The following additional design techniques are suggested to designers for Collector roads and streets:

> Alignment modification including horizontal and vertical curves to avoid sensitive areas and blend into topographical features.

> Alterations to typical cross sections including:

$ Roadside ditches shallower than normal

$ Sideslopes steeper than normal

$ Use of curb, and elimination of the roadside ditch

$ Retaining walls

> Landscaping for screening

> Retrofitting of historical bridges should be considered.

> When existing historic bridges are structurally deficient, and replacement the only solution, new bridge and approach designs should consider aesthetic treatments consistent with the historical context.

> The inclusion of historic design features which enhance integration of the design into the historical setting.

5.15.3 Natural Resources  (Back to top of page)

Collector roads and street construction projects should be designed to avoid natural resources wherever possible. This may be in the form of avoiding disturbance of specific sites or areas where the presence of the road conflicts with natural resources. Where avoidance proves unfeasible, every effort should be made to minimize impacts or pursue mitigation strategies and design enhancements to enable the maximum integration of the Collector Roads and Streets with the resource. Examples of resources included:

> Wetland, lakes, rivers, and streams and their shorelines

> Water supplies

> Groundwater protection areas

> Watershed protection areas

> Agricultural districts and farmland

> Floodplains/ways

> Critical wildlife habitat and natural areas

> Rare and endangered species

> Designated "Wild and Scenic Rivers"

> Local Conservation districts or zones

> State and Federal forests and wildlife management areas

> Outstanding Resource Waters

5.15.4 Recreational Resources   (Back to top of page)

Collector road and street projects should be designed to avoid public recreational facilities and protect and enhance their use wherever possible. Where avoidance proves unfeasible, every effort should be made to minimize impacts including mitigation strategies and design enhancements to enable the maximum integration of the Collector road and streets with the resource. Examples of resources include:

> Federally owned, funded, or managed property

> State owned, funded, or managed property

> Locally owned parks and recreational areas

> Privately owned recreational facilities open to the public

> Trails and Greenways

> Federal and State forest and wildlife management areas

5.15.5 Scenic Roads or Views Considerations  (Back to top of page)

All Collector road and street projects should consider scenic and aesthetic issues for projects that are either designated Scenic Roads or other roads or areas with scenic attributes. Techniques for preservation of scenic resources should be employed for both scenic resources seen from the road, as well as views of the road from surrounding areas. Some of these roads travel through the State's most dramatic landscapes where dominance of the road could negatively impact scenic values. The following additional techniques should be considered where scenic views from the roadway are identified:

> Selection of guard rail type, where required, should be determined based upon visual assessment and the need for visibility through the guardrail vs. blending of the guardrail with the foreground.

> Tree removal or trimming to preserve or enhance views.

> Vegetation management in areas where preservation of existing trees serves to provide visual buffer, frame views, or provide other visual context for the roadway.

> Treatment of bridges, abutments, retaining walls should de-emphasize structures where prominent long views and vistas are present.

> Consider appropriate sign size and placement to prevent blocking of views and to minimize clutter.

> Preservation of old stone walls and tree lines.

5.15.6 Village or City Entrance Considerations  (Back to top of page)

Many of the Collector roads and streets in Vermont enter and pass through towns, villages or cities. These standards are specifically designed to allow greater flexibility to reduce the conflicts with the small scale of many of the affected communities along Collector roads and streets. The following additional guidelines may be appropriate at such locations:

> Strategies for speed management of vehicles entering towns, villages and cities should be employed through roadway design, signage and overall corridor treatments.

> Coordinated street tree and other landscaping will assist in achieving balance between the presence of the road and preserving town character for pedestrians.

> Roadway lighting of an appropriate design: luminaires scale should be reduced to urban-pedestrian scale.

> Aesthetic treatment of bridges, abutments, retaining walls to emphasize gateways to community entrances and prominent features with "architectural" features and materials.

5.15.7 Economic Vitality Considerations  (Back to top of page)

Creative design should integrate economic issues where transportation needs of people, goods and services are significant, and where design of the roadway may affect the vitality of a downtown, commercial or industrial area. In these cases, the following additional guidelines may be appropriate:

> Use appropriate turning radii for large commercial vehicles at appropriate intersections.

> Use lane widths wider than recommended minimums when necessary to accommodate commercial vehicles or anticipated increased traffic volumes.

> Consider truck routes to avoid impacts on downtowns, neighborhoods, and historic districts.

> Retain existing parking, including angle parking, and/or provide additional parking in commercial areas.

> Consider landscaping, lighting, and aesthetic treatments that complement and enhance the commercial identity of a downtown, historic district, shopping district, or recreational area.

> Use appropriate designs for pedestrian and bicycle needs to enhance the vitality of village and urban areas.

> Consider the needs of public transit and intermodal connections, such as bus stops, transfer locations, and park-and-ride lots.

(Back to top of page)

(Back toTable of Contents)

(Back to Project Development Home Page)