banner
 
 
VTrans Home
Contract Admin
Construction Contracting
Pre-Qualification
Currently Advertised Projects
Bid Results
Design - Build
CMGC
Personal Service Contracting
Current RFPs
RFP Status

 

RFP Award List

 

Directions to Contract Admin

 

VTrans Home: Contract Administration: Design - Build Contracting: Bid Results

BID RESULTS FOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECTS
BRATTLEBORO IM 091-(65) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: MARCH 14, 2013
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(50 POINT SCALE) 
*
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(50 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

PCL Civil Constructors, Inc./Figg Bridge Engineers, Inc.
35.67 $59,490,000.00 45.39 81.05 1

Reed & Reed, Inc./HDR Engineering, Inc.
30.94 $54,000,000.00 50.00 80.94 2

Lane Construction Corporation/Hardesty & Hanover, LLP
31.00 $82,812,233.00 32.60 63.60 3


                          Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $54,000,000.00
 

Apparent Best Value Score:  81.05

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

MILTON IM 089-3 (66) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 5, 2012
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE) 
*
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Harrison and Burrowes Bridge Constructors, Inc. /Clough Harbour & Associates, LLP
33.08 $28,277,700.00 49.01 82.09 3

Reed & Reed, Inc./Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
32.44 $29,788,000.00 46.52 78.96 4

Tetra Tech Construction, Inc./URS Corporation
31.19 $23,098,000.00 60.00 91.19 1

Beck & Belluci, Inc./Hoyle Tanner and Associates, Inc.
30.33 $24,639,821.08 56.25 86.58 2


                          Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $23,098,000.00
 

Apparent Best Value Score:  91.19

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

WINDSOR IM 091-1 (64) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: JULY 25, 2012
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE) 
*
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Beck & Bellucci, Inc/Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc.
27.80 $19,958,016.49 60.00 87.80 3

Kubricky Construction Corp./AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
31.30 $23,500,000.00 50.96 82.26 4

Tetra Tech Construction, Inc./Ryan-Biggs Associates, P.C.
22.79 Non-Responsive

The Lane Construction Corp./Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
31.83 $20,624,561.00 58.06 89.89 1

Winterset, Inc./Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc.
31.09 $20,381,800.00 58.75 89.84 2


                          Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $19,958,016.49
 

Apparent Best Value Score:  89.89

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

* Denotes change in Amount from Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal to Confirmed lowest Cost Proposal
 
RICHMOND STP RS 0274 (11) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 16, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE)
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
32.72 $12,900,000.00 60.00 92.72 1

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
Non-Responsive

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
31.44 $18,770,676.00 41.23 72.67 2


                          Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 900,000.00
 

Apparent Best Value Score: 92.72

AND

RICHMOND STP RS 0274 (11) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 16, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE)
CONFIRMED COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
32.72 $12,900,000.00 60.00 92.72 1

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
Non-Responsive

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
31.44 * $18,777,676.00 * 41.22 * 72.66 2


                          Confirmed Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 900,000.00
 

Confirmed Best Value Score: 92.72

AND

RICHMOND STP RS 0274 (11) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 16, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE)
CONFIRMED COST PROPOSAL($)
(REVISED)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
32.72 *$13,900,000.00 60.00 92.72 1

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
Non-Responsive

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
31.44 $18,777,676.00 41.22 72.66 2


                          Confirmed Lowest Cost Proposal: *$13, 900,000.00
 

Confirmed Best Value Score: 92.72

* Revised under Bid Protest January 3, 2011

 
BRATTLEBORO IM 091-1 (50) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: OCTOBER 5, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(30 POINT SCALE)
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(70 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Beck & Bellucci, Inc./
TY Lin International
24.90 $12,476,857.83 70.00 94.90 1

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
26.34 $23,394,000.00 37.33 63.67 4

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
24.48 $18,888,700.00 46.24 70.72 3

Winterset, Inc./
Parsons-Brinkerhoff
21.24 $16,860,278.40 51.80 73.04 2


                          Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 476, 857.83
 

Apparent Best Value Score: 94.90

AND

BRATTLEBORO IM 091-1 (50) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: OCTOBER 5, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(30 POINT SCALE)
CONFIRMED COST PROPOSAL($) COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(70 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
 RANK

Beck & Bellucci, Inc./
TY Lin International
24.90 $12,476,857.83 70.00 94.90 1

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
26.34 $23,394,000.00 37.33 63.67 4

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
24.48 $18,888,700.00 46.24 70.72 3

Winterset, Inc./
Parsons-Brinkerhoff
21.24 $16,860,278.40 51.80 73.04 2


                          Confirmed Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 476, 857.83
 

Confirmed Best Value Score: 94.90

 

Design - Build Links:

D-B Home FAQ Upcoming Current RFQ Status Bid Results Awards

For questions or suggestions on our website please email us by clicking here.

 

         Back to Contract Administration's Home Page